Stimulating
Understanding of
Computational science through
Collaboration,
Exploration,
Experiment, and
Discovery for students with
Hearing
Impairments
|
a collaboration of the Shodor Education Foundation, Inc., Eastern North Carolina School for the Deaf, Barton College, the National Technical Institute for the Deaf, and
Interpreters, Inc.
|
Search
|
For Teachers!
How does your hair know how long to grow?
Notes on teaching the lesson: The students are learning on two levels in this lesson. First, they are learning how our bodies regulate the length of our hairs. Hairs grow
for a length of time, rest and then fall out. The length of a type of hair depends on the rate of growth times the length of time it grows. If you cut your hair the cut hairs
will be shorter when they stop growing. Hairs that were too short to be cut or hadn't started growing yet will reach the maximum length and stop growing.
Second, they are learning how scientists learn by asking questions. Two types of questions are emphasized in this
lesson: verification and validation. These are different
ways to check if the answer is correct. Verification is checking that we followed the directions
correctly: If you do what I did, will you get the same answer?
For instance, 2+2 = 4. You can verify that with a calculator. Validation asks if the procedure was reasonable or
correct: Did this situation call for addition and not subtraction? Scientists need
to be careful with what they are doing, and they need to be careful with why they are doing it.
The following are the student pages. Answers and suggestions for the teacher are in
BLUE.
Teacher Support
Answers to questions.
Hair Science page
A single hair has a thickness of 0.02-0.04mm. How many hairs next to each other would you need to equal one millimeter?
25-50 hair fibers next to each other make one millimeter.
0.02mm X 50 = 1mm, 0.04mm X 25 = 1 mm
Math page
There are really 365.25 days in a year if you consider leap year.
Is it important to include that in our calculation?
The longest a hair can grow is 8 years. The average person's longest growing hair only grows 4 or 5 years. Scalp hairs grow .44 mm/day.
.25days/year X .44 mm/day X 8 years = .88 mm. The biggest difference leap year can contribute is less than 1 mm. For most people it is even less than that. This
probably isn't significant as a single factor. If the model grows in complexity and additional factors are added with their own inherent errors, the errors can
add up. This
cumulative effect could become a problem.
How many years would your scalp hair need to grow to be 60 cm long? About 45 months or 3.75 years
How many years would your scalp hair need to grow to be 90 cm long? About 67 months or 5.58 years
How many months would it take to grow a beard of 15 cm? 12.46 months 1.04 years
Science Extension page
Lets revisit the data. The literature says that everyday 40 to 100 scalp hairs fall out. We have about 100,000 scalp hairs.
How long would it take for all of them to fall out?
100,000/40 = 2,500 days or 6.85 years 100,000/100 = 1,000 days or 2.74 years
Science Enrichment page
The graph plots the length of the hair with the hair's number. I measured 100 hairs and put the measurements in a spreadsheet. (Download
the
Excel spread sheet.) and gave them numbers 1-100. I next
sorted the data by the length column. That gave the longest hair the number 1 and the shortest hair the
number 100. Then I plotted the length versus the hair number so I could see how the range varies. I plotted the
data this way to find a pattern. Given the results, can we
derive additional information from the graph? Can we conclude that hair number one has the fastest growth rate? Yes. The slope of the line from 1 to about 85 is the
rate at which the growth rate changes.
Is the graph linear? No, but the graph appears to be a combination of 2 lines with a vertex at approximately 85.
Why does the graph change direction at 85? I assert that the hairs above number 85 spent part of the time in telogen phase, i.e., they were resting during part of the
months since I cut her hair. Hair 100 just started to grow again in March, so it is very short. Hair 86 started
anagen (growing again) a few days after I cut her hair.
Which explanation of growth rate does the graph support?
I would argue that if hairs grow at a constant rate there would be a horizontal line for all of the hairs that
were in anagen for the entire time since I cut her hair. There would also be a sloping line for hairs that spend varying lengths of time in telogen. There is no horizontal
section on the graph so the hairs grow at different rates during different parts of the
anagen phase. The data supports the statement that the hairs grow at different rates
but it doesn't give us enough information to draw conclusions about how the rate changes.
Our models assume a constant average growth rate. STELLA allows us to make the growth rate variable a function of the place the hair is in its growth cycle. Since the
hair appears to grow fast when it is young and slower when it is long and old how would this affect the answer to our analysis of a braid's diameter?
Have the students change the STELLA model to account for the varying growth rate. I haven't made these changes because my data is very preliminary. It needs to be
replicated and improved by including the additional measurements mentioned in the criticisms.
If you don't have STELLA at your school you can down load a free Version of
STELLA. This version is exactly like STELLA except you can't save your models. You can start
with my model and modify it.
Have your students replicate my hair measuring experiment. Send us (at Shodor) their report and we will post it with this lesson. If you have a school web page, post
the report yourself and we will link to your report.
If you have STELLA at your school and made improvements to my model please email them to me so I can post them, or post them yourself and let me know so I can link
to your page.
Copyright © 1999-2001 by The Shodor Education Foundation, Inc.
by the National Science FoundationOpinions expressed are those of the authorsand not necessarily those of the National Science Foundation. |