BWF Student Science Enrichment Program Directors
1999 ANNUAL MEETING
1999 Directors' Meeting /
2001 Directors' Meeting /
2002 Directors' Meeting
The Burroughs Wellcome Fund convened program directors of the Student
Science Enrichment Program on Tuesday, January 12, 1999, at the Fearrington
House in Pittsboro, North Carolina. Members of the Science Education
Advisory Committee, BWF staff, and Board liaisons also attended.
Martha Peck, Vice President for Programs, welcomed the group, after which
Carr Agyapong, Senior Program Officer for the Student Science Enrichment
Program outlined the purpose of the meeting and its objectives. Each
program director described their program and provided an overview of their
program accomplishments for the past year. Open discussions of issues
identified by program directors at last year's meeting were lead by the 1996
award recipients and assigned advisory committee members. John Burris,
chair of the committee, served as moderator of this session. The following
issues were discussed at the meeting. Included are the group's input and
suggestions for "best practices."
Recruitment of Students
Facilitator:
Charles Eilber, Advisory Committee
Discussants:
- Jennifer Howard, Cumberland County Schools
- Karen Shafer, University of North Carolina-Wilmington
- Alice Toth, American Heart Association
- Trish Whiting, Durham Academy
Concerns with recruiting students include identifying quality participants,
particularly minorities, underrepresented, or home school students who may
be eligible for programs but were not readily reached with current
strategies; identifying quality advisors and staff members to guide these
students in the hands-on activities developed for programs; and encouraging
regular attendance by student participants. The following are practices
identified:
- Utilize the media to better market programs such as broadcasting
information on community channels through local television stations and
placing videos on these channels.
- Develop flyers and distribute them widely.
- Utilize e-mail and other electronic communications. Electronic
application submission is one way to reduce paper and make applying easier
for children with computers.
- Have face-to-face meetings with parents through Parent Teacher
Association (PTA) or Parent Teacher Student Association (PTSA) meetings.
Parents were identified as a major resource. If you have parents who are
pleased with the results of your program and with their student's
experience, they can be your best advocates in spreading the word about your
program, encouraging other parents to enroll their students into your
programs, and enrolling other siblings into the program.
- Attend and get on the agenda for meetings of professional
organizations such as N.C. Biology Teachers Association.
- Understand that word-of-mouth is still one of the largest mediums to
get the word out about programs.
- Have each student bring another student; keep in mind that students
who enjoy the experience will likely recommend the program to their friends.
- Establish a connection with statewide programs. State level
recruitment makes it easier to locate students. For those programs not
connected with a statewide program, it may be necessary to identify other
resources, such as the Department for Public Instruction, the Ministerial
Alliance, especially if you are interested in recruiting minority students,
and other social organizations that may reach middle school and high school
students.
- Provide financial incentives for students especially at the high
school level if you are interested in having these students participate.
Many high school students take on summer jobs, which prevent them from
participating.
- Visit schools with outreach programs, and coordinate with them and
other organizations to recruit students.
Program Structure: Maximizing Hands-On Activities
Facilitator: Gail Morse, Advisory Committee
Discussants:
- Dean Briere, NC Museum of Life and Science
- Duke Johnson, SciWorks, Margaret Kepner, Grey Culbreth Middle School
Concerns in this area involve securing new and challenging mentorship
opportunities for students, involving mentors in science on a more regular
basis, and determining how much lecturing is too much. Some suggestions
that were generated include:
- Establish relationships with mentors. This can be done by
identifying the expertise of parents of students involved in your programs,
and reaching out into the local community to academia and industry to seek
volunteers willing to share their time and expertise.
- Identify existing programs that may have similar goals as your
programs and make connections with those programs.
- Contact groups or organizations that the program director is
familiar with to network and gain insight on programs they offer. Many
activities can be developed as a result of these collaborations--for example
business partners can come on-sight and share with students information
about their career paths and what students should know about succeeding in
the world of work.
- Utilize electronic mentors if your students have access to
computers. The Centers for Disease Control, NASA, and other organizations
have interactive websites that your students can visit.
- Consider the age of students to determine the type of activities and
the curriculum of programs being offered. Studies show that people with
science related careers reported that visits to museums were their most
memorable informal science experiences as children. If your program is
reaching middle school students, then providing hands-on activities through
museum environments can be a good way to stimulate their interest in
science. Also, if there is a way to reinforce what students are learning in
school by offering exciting hands-on activities after school or during the
summer, you will find that students will be much more receptive to the
information you are trying to share.
- Involve students in all aspects of program development. In order to
get students to be enthusiastic about science, it is necessary to have their
buy-in. Students can identify the areas of science that are of particular
interest to them, and receive research and laboratory assignments under the
direction of mentors.
- Solicit and listen to student feedback concerning your program.
Incorporate their suggestions as a means of "continuous quality
improvements."
Program Sustainability
Facilitator: Shirley Malcom, Ph.D., Advisory Committee
Discussants:
- Barbara Beamon, NC State Museum of Natural Sciences
- Sharon Carter, Science STARS Universe
- Jonathan Shectman, UNC Mathematics and Science Education Network
- Vicki Stocking, Duke University TIP
Concerns in this area include identifying strategies for sustaining
programs, finding sources for continuation of funds, expanding programs,
expanding non-school activities into school-based integrated programs, and
developing a continuum of learning for SSEP students from one program to
another program. To sustain any program, it was noted that advertising is a
critical factor in getting the word out to keep the number of participants
up. Human advertisements by students who wear tee-shirts with a program's
name has proven to be effective. Discussions generated the following ideas:
- Identify resources to endow programs. This was determined to be the
ideal situation for any ongoing program.
- Utilize local funds from professional societies.
- Identify federal dollars, such as the Eisenhower Funds.
- Apply for the Twenty-First Century Community Learning Center Program
offered by the Department of Education.
- Tap into state funding with the Smart Start Program.
- Consider tuition-based programs.
- Utilize college students through work-study programs to garner
support from local colleges and universities.
- Refine programs to adapt to students' needs to keep them coming
back. This could include redesigning the curriculum to challenge students.
- Work with students to identify their peak interests.
- Show a genuine interest in the students' development by moving them
from one program to another hands-on science enrichment program.
- Have interested parents request information about your programs from
school officials. This will bring publicity to your programs, and will
inform schools about programs that parents feel are working. This may
encourage school administrators to add your program to the school
curriculum.
- Partner with other organizations, such as professional societies,
fraternities and sororities, ministerial alliances, welfare to work
programs, and Ameri-Corp.
- Contact individuals who may have an interest in including your
program into their estate planning.
The afternoon session included a presentation on evaluation by Iris Weiss of
Horizon Research. She provided a summary of data submitted by SSEP students
and project directors. She stressed the follows:
- Evaluation is a key component of BWF's program and may
influence grant renewal.
- Project directors must give the exact number of
participants, which is essential to determine the proper response rate. If
the actual student enrollment changes from the projected enrollment, this
must be noted in correspondence with Horizon and BWF.
- Students should complete their evaluations, on-site. The
response rates are lower for those returned by mail.
- Horizons has developed a new Project Director's survey; Iris
assured the group that BWF would receive their responses on question 5
anonymously (not connected to a particular program) in order to encourage
greater candor.
She then provided a group evaluation exercise of a mock Student Science
Enrichment project and had the group develop a plan for documenting the
impact of the project on student:
- Enthusiasm for science
- Understanding an appreciation of the scientific process
- Competence in science
- Career aspirations
The sense of the group was that one needed to integrate closely evaluation
and project development since both were inextricably linked. Evaluation
provides data about activities and their effectiveness in engaging students
and meeting program goals. Properly designed, an evaluation process can
give indicators regarding the presumption that informal science education is
not necessarily a set of interventions with short-term impacts, but rather a
means of influencing the context within which science is learned and
experienced over the long term.
Bob Panoff of the Shodor Foundation introduced the new website for SSEP
directors, students, parents, and educators. The web address is
www.shodor.org/ssep/ . We encourage all to
utilize this wonderful tool. Karen Hoffman of the North Carolina
Association for Biomedical Research gave an overview of her organization and
the services that they can provide to SSEP directors, educators and students
through the web site and through direct contact.
The meeting was adjourned around 4:15 p.m.
Last Modified: